Do Ford’s Q4 2010 Results Mean the Turnaround Has Stalled?

By Chris Haak

Ford has been releasing some increasingly attractive earnings reports lately, dating back seven quarters, showing only black ink on its GAAP financials since the second quarter of 2009.  And with the book closed on Ford’s fourth quarter results for 2010, the company announced its largest annual net income – a hefty $6.56 billion – in more than a decade.  The good results are a product of Ford getting three key areas right:  volume, product mix, and pricing.  Also, Ford now has zero “net debt,” which means that the company now has more cash on its balance sheet than it does debt.  Without the benefit of bankruptcy the purge the balance sheet like GM and Chrysler “enjoyed,” Ford has been at a competitive disadvantage by having to pay larger interest payments than its rivals did.

But amid the hype about Ford’s annual results for 2010, the company’s fourth quarter 2010 results were somewhat pedestrian by the standards that it’s set over the past two years.  Fourth quarter GAAP earnings were “only” $190 million.  Ford reported net income of $886 million in the fourth quarter of 2009, which is nearly an 80 percent decline.  But, as is usually the case, the headline numbers don’t tell the whole story.

In its efforts to pay down its debt – you’ll recall that in 2006, Ford mortgaged itself nearly completely to finance its restructuring and development of new models, like the current Fiesta and coming-soon Focus – Ford had to make a $960 million payment in the fourth quarter in order to retire convertible debt.  Excluding special charges such as that one-time item, Ford would have earned $1.2 billion on the quarter, which is mostly in line with its results throughout the other quarters in 2010.  The overall 43 percent reduction in debt from 2009 to 2010 means that Ford has to spend $1 billion less on interest than it did a year ago.  That’s real money.

So the headline is explainable, but what about the unexpected loss that Ford’s European operations reported?  Ford Europe showed a $51 million loss, as demand sagged with the end of scrappage programs (which lasted much longer than the US Cash-for-Clunkers program did).  But Ford lost market share in Europe, and saw its sales fall further than the overall soft market’s did.  The company attributed its market share loss to its decision to “reduce participation selectively in low-margin business” in Europe.  Ford is not alone with its struggles in Europe; just as the old country was Ford’s weakest link, so was GM Europe in GM’s final 2010 results.

The biggest negatives from Ford’s fourth quarter were higher structural costs and higher commodity costs.  Commodity costs are going to rise for all automakers as the global economy shakes off its slump and improves; there will be more demand for commodities and therefore prices will continue to rise.  Smart manufacturers have established hedging strategies for mitigating some of the commodity cost increases that are expected over the next few years; it’s unclear whether Ford has been able to offset some of those price increases.

Ford attributed the structural cost increase to product launches and new product development.  If the company wants to maintain its sales growth momentum, it’s essential that it not only spend adequate money on marketing the new products, but that it continue to keep the pipeline of future products full and fresh.  In my mind, there’s nothing wrong with investing in sales and marketing, and especially nothing wrong with investing money in future products.  The expense of paying a supplier to produce tens of thousands of new rear axles for the recalled Windstar minivans also hit Ford’s structural cost numbers for the fourth quarter.

Ford shares were pummeled after the company announced its fourth quarter results, though.  Why?  Analysts had been assuming mistakenly that Ford’s fixed costs would remain relatively flat as the industry’s selling rate (known as SAAR) increased during 2011 past the 12 million mark.  It’s clear now that Ford is not counting on gaining sales from only a rising tide, but also expects to continue to take share away from some of its competitors, and to do that costs money.

The Blue Oval company is not completely out of the woods yet.  Though Ford has made considerable progress toward reaching a profitable, sustainable future, the company still has too much debt.  With efforts still underway at Ford to reduce debt and improve products, Ford has a bright future.  Its credit arm is profitable, as are its automotive operations.  Now, if it could just get its European operations turned around – and keep up its recent product cadence – it very well may begin printing money, as analysts had hoped it would in the fourth quarter of 2010.

In short, the turnaround has not stalled.  Ford is still in good shape and getting healthier each quarter.

Author: Chris Haak

Chris is Autosavant's Managing Editor. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Share This Post On


  1. For exactly the reasons outlined, no substantial verdict can be obtained from one quarter of earnings. As you mentioned, the possiblility of commondity price increases may derail Ford, but the global recovery is fragile, and we don’t know for sure if a substantive recovery is underway. Europe is concerning, but I have to wonder if the new Focus had something to do with Ford’s poor performance. The Focus is Ford’s best-selling vehicle in Europe, and it is not unreasonable to assume many Europeans have been holding off Focus purchases until the new model comes out. I don’t have sales data to back this up, it’s just a thought. Another concern I have about Ford’s future plan is the lack of information regarding Australia. With all the intigration going on, how does Australia fit in? It would seem semsible to leave RWD car design to the Aussies, since vehicles like the Falcon are so popular down there. This RWD architecture could be used on the Mustang and maybe a Lincoln or two (if Ford thinks Lincoln will ever be at the level of BMW or Lexus, they need RWD, just look at Acura).

  2. I sold the last of my Ford stock yesterday. With a new contract being neogotiated this summer with the UAW and not a lot more in the product pipeline I felt it was time to sell.

  3. I hope you got in at a good price, creigs9. If so, congrats on buying low and selling high. Individual stocks are too much of a gamble for me personally, unless it’s extra money that I don’t mind losing.

  4. It was by far the best investment I ever made. I felt kinda bad selling it as i’m a blue oval fan boy. But without a dividend, I think it’s reached about all it’s potential.

  5. The 930 million payment deducted from the gross made it look worse than it was and that payment will be a positive down the road!

    But I think high gas prices will hurt the economy and Ford more than most! Their cash cow has been pickups!!! Retail sales for pickups will decline the bottom line!

    I think Mually has done a great job restructing Ford!

    But other than Pickups, and Fusions and mabe Mustang, I just dont like their future product stradety! Killing Mercury instead of investing in it! The playbook for Lincoln seems vanilla, no rear wheel drives cars!

    Mercury could have been like GM did Buick and Lincoln like Cadilliac! That was the playbook Edsel Ford used when it started and would work now if executed correctly!

    Just having “ONE FORD” might not work!!!!

  6. Wall Street is the poorest metric by which we can measure a company’s performance. Remember, these are the folks who helped torpedo the economy in the first place. These are people who applaud (generally) when a company announces layoffs and outsources production to a low-wage country. These are people who don’t make a thing but are the experts on making everything.

    Ford still has its share of problems, but they have worked miracles without the benefit of being able to shed all kinds of liabilities as did GM and Chrysler. Other than increasing operating costs, the biggest headache on the horizon is the UAW. I hope I’m wrong, but the UAW doesn’t seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed. They will look at Ford’s overall profitability as reason #1 to go back to the bad old ways.


  1. Tweets that mention Do Ford’s Q4 2010 Results Mean the Turnaround Has Stalled? | Autosavant -- - [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Autosavant, Peet Yssel. Peet Yssel said: Do Ford's Q4 2010 Results Mean…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.