Archive | June, 2008

Can Renault Save Europe’s Mainstream Coupé Market?

By Andy Bannister

06.20.2008

One of the most rapidly shrinking sectors of the European car market – that for two-door coupés produced by the mainstream manufacturers – is about to get a much-needed boost with the unveiling of a new entry from Renault.

The Laguna coupé, recently previewed in Monaco and Cannes, is an attempt to inject some much-needed glamour into the French giant’s range, which currently mainly consists of small cars and MPVs.

Not that many years ago, most bread-and-butter European makes has at least one closed coupé to get punters into the showrooms and add interest to their range, but this trend has been under attack from two sides.

Prestige brands like Mercedes, BMW and Audi have now taken the class way up the price scale, leaving the mass-market badges behind. The big players have in turn have been wooed by the blossoming popularity of electric metal-roof cabriolets (such as the VW Eos), with a various ungainly fat-rumped competitors from Peugeot, Renault, Opel and Ford vying for sales.

Among the traditional two-door closed coupés only Peugeot, with its biggish 407, is still in contention. Recent sales figures, though, make dismal reading. In 2007 Peugeot shifted only 8,545 of their coupé across the whole of Europe, down a whopping 32.6% on the previous year. To put that into some context, in the specialist prestige sector Porsche’s 911 and Alfa Romeo’s GT both sold over 12,000 units in the same period.

Peugeot’s performance is probably not helped by the shortcomings of its contender. Its predecessor, the 406 coupé, was a great looker from all angles thanks to its sleek Pininfarina styling, but the replacement 407 coupé (pictured) is far from beautiful or even memorable. In truth it looks more ordinary than the saloon and station wagon models in the fading 407 range.

Renault itself has a fairly poor track record as far as coupés are concerned. In the 1970s it sold two related small three-door models called the 15 and 17 with only average success, following these up with the bold-looking Fuego of 1981, which saw sales collapse after a promising start and led the French maker to abandon the market in favour of hot hatchbacks.

Its choice of the Laguna (a VW Passat competitor) as the basis for a coupé revival aims the new car right at the jugular of arch-rival Peugeot. More importantly, Renault must be hoping it kick-starts interest in the new but rather overlooked third-generation Laguna family, which is already on sale in other bodystyles and has been much criticised for its bland styling, particularly compared to the nice-looking previous generation model. The new coupé appears much better proportioned, at least.

Incidentally, the Laguna is a lineal descendant of the obscure car known to Americans as the Eagle Medallion, if anyone remembers the ill-fated Renault link with doomed AMC back in the 1980s.

Mechanically, the new car comes with existing engines from the Laguna range plus a new Renault-Nissan diesel and petrol V6. The 3.0-litre oil-burner packs 235hp and 332lb ft of torque, while the 3.5-litre petrol unit offers 240bhp and 244lb ft; both come with an automatic transmission. The petrol V6 will be the range-topping model and should hit 60mph in under seven seconds.

The Laguna coupé will be shown in greater detail at Paris Motor Show this autumn. The company will pitch it as “designed to offer sheer driving pleasure”. The press release gushes: “It epitomizes this savoir-faire when it comes to motoring enjoyment and quality which is built into its genes and which can be seen in the finish which matches even the most demanding standards”.

The coupé hopes to “play a key role in the Renault’s brand’s expansion in the upper-range market”, the release adds. Given the near-invisibility of the company’s current Vel Satis executive car, and the embarrassing flop of the recent Avantime model, whose poor sales led to a remarkably premature death, Renault is possibly being a mite optimistic.

It’s interesting to wonder why the company hasn’t learned more from its alliance partner, Nissan. about making larger cars which appeal to consumers. Nissan will shortly introduce the Infiniti brand in Europe for the first time (albeit remarkably late in the day).

Another problem Renault and Peugeot both face is that their respective coupés don’t sell in North America, by far the biggest market for cars of this type.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 3 }

Ford Delays 2009 F-150 Launch Two Months

By Brendan Moore

06.20.2008

Other shoes continue to drop over at Ford, with the company sending out a press release this morning that says that the 2009 F-150 pickup truck launch has been pushed back an additional two months to late fall. Ford stated that they simply have too many 2008 F-150 pickups in their inventory still, and they need more time to sell down their existing stock.

Delaying the debut of the new F-150 is big news; the truck has been the linchpin of Ford’s profits for decades, and this sort of move is not something that Ford takes lightly, or for that matter, would do unless it just absolutely had to. Ford also announced further cuts in overall truck production for the rest of 2008 calendar year. Ford also reduced its financial outlook for 2008, saying that the recent (and massive) shift in consumer tastes from large vehicles to small, fuel-efficient vehicles has thrown their sales forecast into turmoil.

Ford now expects that sales this year will be worse than last year, and has adjusted their industry-wide forecast to a range of 14.7 million units to 15.2 million units. June sales industry-wide are currently trending at a 12.4 million unit rate if extrapolated to an annualized basis.

Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford, stated, “As gasoline prices average more than $4 a gallon and consumers worry about the weak U.S. economy, we see June industry-wide auto sales slowing further and demand for large trucks and SUVs at one of the lowest levels in decades. Ford has taken decisive action to respond to this accelerating shift in customer demand away from large trucks and SUVs to smaller cars and crossovers, and we will continue to act swiftly moving forward.” Our sources at Ford have told us that there is more to this statement than PR window-dressing; it is believed that Mulally and his senior leadership team have already decided to shut down several truck plants, invest the money to completely retool those plants, and start producing Ford’s small European models here in the U.S. as soon as possible.
Ford says publicly that they will provide more information on their future manufacturing plans at their July meeting when they announce second-quarter financial results.

Here is a copy of the official press release put out by Ford this morning:

PRESS RELEASE: FORD FURTHER CUTS TRUCK PRODUCTION

FORD FURTHER CUTS TRUCK PRODUCTION AS DEMAND SLOWS; MORE CARS, CROSSOVERS, FUEL-SAVING POWERTRAINS ADDED

Next-generation European Ford Focus and Fiesta small cars reach North America in 2010
* North American large truck and SUV production further reduced for remainder of 2008; new Ford F-150 pickup introduction timing adjusted due to market conditions and current-model sell-down
* Production reductions will be achieved through additional downtime, shift reductions and line-speed actions at Ford’s large truck and SUV assembly plants
* Production will increase for the Ford Focus sedan and Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner small utility vehicles
* Next-generation, European Ford Focus and Fiesta small cars to begin production in North America in 2010, as Ford confirms it is revising its product plan to add more small cars, crossovers and fuel-efficient powertrains, including many from Ford’s acclaimed European lineup
* More details and an updated outlook will be provided during Ford’s second-quarter financial report in July; it is clear, however, that 2008 Automotive results will be worse than 2007, cash outflows will be greater than previous guidance and, unless the economy improves, it will be difficult for Ford to break even companywide on a pre-tax basis in 2009, excluding special items
* Ford Motor Credit Company will incur a pre-tax loss this year – excluding any potential payment related to Ford’s profit maintenance agreement – primarily due to further weakness in large truck and SUV auction values; Ford Credit no longer plans a distribution payment to Ford in 2008

DEARBORN, Mich., June 20, 2008 – Ford Motor Company [NYSE: F] today said it is making further reductions to its North American truck production plan while adding more small cars, crossovers and fuel-efficient powertrains, as the company responds to the continued deterioration in the U.S.business environment and the accelerated shift away from large trucks and SUVs.

“As gasoline prices average more than $4 a gallon and consumers worry about the weak U.S. economy, we see June industry-wide auto sales slowing further and demand for large trucks and SUVs at one of the lowest levels in decades,” said Ford President and CEO Alan Mulally. “Ford has taken decisive action to respond to this accelerating shift in customer demand away from large trucks and SUVs to smaller cars and crossovers, and we will continue to act swiftly moving forward.”

Ford now expects U.S. industry volume in 2008 – including medium and heavy vehicles – to be between 14.7 million and 15.2 million units, compared with the previous assumption of 15 million to 15.4 million units. Accordingly, in the third quarter, Ford now plans to produce 475,000 vehicles, a reduction of 50,000 units from previously announced plans and a decline of 25 percent compared with the 2007 third quarter. In the fourth quarter, Ford plans to produce 550,000 to 590,000 units, a reduction of 40,000 units from previously announced plans and a decline of 8 to 14 percent compared with the 2007 fourth quarter.

In parallel, Ford is adjusting the public introduction timing of the new 2009 Ford F-150 by approximately two months due to the industry-wide slowdown in the U.S. truck market and the need to sell down dealer inventory of the current model. The new F-150 now will go on sale in late fall.

“The new 2009 F-150 raises the bar yet again on capability, quality and durability, and we know core truck customers are eagerly awaiting its arrival,” said Mark Fields, Ford’s President of The Americas. “Our plan all along has been to introduce the new F-150 after our dealers had a chance to sell down inventory of the existing model, and – with the current slowdown in the marketplace – we decided it was prudent to adjust the start of public sale for the new truck by about two months.”

With these actions, Ford said it now is clear that 2008 pre-tax Automotive results will be worse than 2007, cash outflows to fund operating losses and restructuring will be greater than previous guidance and, unless the economy improves, it will be difficult for Ford to break even companywide on a pre-tax basis in 2009, excluding special items. Ford North America still expects to reduce annual operating costs by about $5 billion by the end of 2008 – at constant volume, mix and exchange, and excluding special items – compared with 2005.

Ford Motor Credit Company now will incur a pre-tax loss this year – excluding any potential payment related to Ford’s profit maintenance agreement – primarily due to further weakness in large truck and SUV auction values. Ford Credit no longer is planning a distribution payment to Ford in 2008.

Ford said it will provide more details on changes to its overall plan when it announces second-quarter financial results in July. In the meantime, Ford is taking the following production actions:
* Production of the 2009 F-150 now will begin in August at Kansas City Assembly Plant and in September at Dearborn Truck. One shift will be eliminated at both Kansas City (from two to one) and Dearborn (from three to two). Dearborn Truck will be idled most of the third quarter.
* Michigan Truck Plant will be idled for nine consecutive weeks beginning the week of June 23, in line with demand for the company’s full-size SUVs.
* One shift of production will be eliminated at Louisville Assembly Plant for mid-size SUVs in the third quarter.
* The line speed will be reduced at Kentucky Truck Plant for large pickups in the third quarter.
* The line speed will be reduced at Chicago Assembly in the third quarter for full-size sedans.
* Production will wind down at Cuautitlan Assembly Plant in Mexico by the end of 2008. The plant, which now produces large pickups, will be retooled for production of the new Fiesta small car for North America beginning in early 2010.
Ford also is taking the following actions to increase capacity in the third quarter:
* Oakville Assembly will add a third shift for production of the Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX and all-new 2009 Ford Flex crossovers.
* Kansas City Assembly Plant’s line that produces the Ford Escape, Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner and Mariner Hybrid small utility vehicles will add a third shift.
* Wayne Assembly Plant’s body and paint shops will add a third shift, and the line-speed will be increased for final assembly production of the popular Ford Focus small car.

Production at Ford’s stamping, engine and transmission plants is being adjusted in line with the changes in assembly capacity.

“We view the move to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles as permanent, and we are responding to customer demand,” Mulally said. “In the near term, we are adjusting production to the actual demand – increasing small cars and crossovers and reducing large trucks and SUVs. For the long term, we are moving fast to introduce more small cars, crossovers and fuel-efficient powertrains – including more hybrids – and we will adjust our manufacturing facilities to match our updated product lineup.”
Ford said it is uniquely positioned to build on its strength today as a crossover vehicle leader, while leveraging its small car expertise in Europe and bringing more of those vehicles to North America.

In addition to hatchback and sedan versions of the European-engineered Ford Fiesta small car that goes on sale in North America in early 2010, Ford is announcing today that four- and five-door versions of the next-generation European Ford Focus small car will be produced in North America beginning in late 2010.

The new Focus will be common with Europe, South America and Asia Pacific and represent the next generation of today’s successful European Focus. Excellent fuel economy will be achieved through new highly efficient direct-injection engine technology and a new advanced six-speed transmission.

The new Focus and Fiesta – as well as other small cars and crossovers from Europe – will be part of an unprecedented period of new Ford product introductions that has only just begun in North America. The new Ford Flex crossover and Lincoln MKS sedan went on sale this month, and the new F-150 goes on sale in late fall. New versions of the Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Lincoln MKZ mid-size cars debut late this year, as do all-new hybrid versions of the Fusion and Milan.

By the end of this year, 70 percent of all Ford, Lincoln and Mercury products by volume in North America will be new or significantly upgraded compared with the 2006 models. By the end of 2010, 100 percent of the product lineup will be new, including in 2009 the next-generation Mustang, new fuel-saving EcoBoost engines and new European Transit Connect.

“We remain absolutely committed to accelerating the development of the new products that customers want and value,” Mulally said. “We sell some of the best smaller cars and utility vehicles in the world in our profitable European and South American operations, and our plan is to introduce these same vehicles in North America as quickly as possible. This is an integral part of our plan to leverage our global assets and achieve our goal of profitable growth.”

Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Mich., manufactures or distributes automobiles in 200 markets across six continents. With about 244,000 employees and about 90 plants worldwide, the company’s core and affiliated automotive brands include Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo and Mazda. The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. For more information regarding Ford’s products, please visit www.ford.com.

# # #

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 3 }

Attention Hypermilers – Please Don’t Be a Traffic Impediment

By Chris Haak

06.20.2008

With average US gas prices over $4 per gallon (and a near-celebration that the average fell two tenths of a cent over the past few days), a growing number of individuals have decided that rather than shopping for the lowest gas prices or considering the purchase of a more fuel-efficient vehicle, they will do their best to eke out fuel economy numbers that are seemingly impossible to achieve.

We’ve all seen the standard tips for fuel efficient driving a thousand times; don’t waste energy by accelerating or braking hard; keep speeds down, keep tires properly inflated, keep the air filter clean and the car well-tuned, etc. In this environment, however, there are people who call themselves “hypermilers” who take all of the above steps to the highest power, plus use some more extreme fuel-saving tips to get incredible fuel economy figures far above EPA estimates.

Instead of inflating their tires to 32 PSI, a hypermiler might inflate his to 50 PSI, which reduces the size of the contact patch and therefore adversely affects handling, braking, and steering performance, but the harder tires also roll down the road more easily.

Other tricks – sometimes questionable – employed by hypermilers include using a thinner viscosity motor oil to reduce internal friction, removing unused seats and extraneous weight from their vehicles, turning off their engine at traffic lights (sometimes even in stop and go traffic), coasting down hills in neutral, and fastidiously avoiding the use of air conditioning or other electrical accessories that might require the car’s alternator to engage. Knowing that I might be on the road simultaneously with a hypermiler, I’m not inclined to appreciate their overinflated tires (making them more likely to be in an accident), out-of-control downhill coasting in neutral, or having to wait for them to restart their engine at each prolonged stop in traffic or at a red light.

I’d read about these “hypermiler” creatures before – and frankly was uninterested in any of their techniques due to a combination of impatience and safety reasons – but had never seen a hypermiler in the wild before. Until this evening, that is.

On my commute home from work, I encountered a Toyota Tercel similar to the one pictured above with its hazard flashers activated in the right-hand shoulder of the two-lane road I was traveling on. At first glance, I assumed the car was pulled over for one reason or another, but later realized that it was actually moving down the road, albeit at a slow pace (probably about 25-30 miles per hour in a 45 miles per hour speed limit). Just as I approached the car, the driver zipped in front of me in the true travel lane to avoid something on the shoulder, and I realized what I had just seen. I’m generally not the most observant person in the world, but the stickers and placards all over the back window (which, incidentally, is another safety hazard) saying, “I’m a hypermiler! 58 miles per gallon!” among other things really helped give away his intent. Curious after reading his rear window display, I kept a closer eye on this individual. The weather was sunny and in the high-70s, and the driver maneuvered back to the shoulder, I noticed that he had his windows open and was sweating profusely. Hopefully the sweat was caused by his shame for dawdling along on the shoulder (illegally) and not by his discomfort in a hot car.

The fundamental question that a hypermiler has to ask himself is whether the safety, comfort, and time sacrifices are all worth it to save $13.92 per week (assuming that the guy I saw gets 58 miles per gallon in his Tercel rather than the 31 miles per gallon a 1994 Tercel was rated at by the EPA in the adjusted 2008 scale). Assuming 12,000 miles per year, he’d save 181 gallons of gas, which is $724 per year, $60 per month, or $13.92 per week. More importantly for me, however, is that he probably irritates 181 motorists per day by driving around them on the shoulder in traffic, dodging in front of them when there is a shoulder obstruction, and visually bragging about his fuel efficiency claims all over his back window.

Hypermiling is not for me, but for people that do choose to engage in it, please be considerate of other motorists. Really, your fuel economy is not as important to your fellow motorists as safe, considerate driving.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 11 }

GM Announces 2009 Corvette ZR1 Price, Performance

By Chris Haak

06.19.2008

GM has released the official pricing and performance specifications for its fastest, most powerful, most expensive vehicle in company history – the 2009 Corvette ZR1. Basically, all of the numbers – pricing, performance, even fuel economy – turned out almost exactly where everyone expected them to. But it’s only when you step back to consider these numbers, particularly when taken together, that it really sinks in just how incredible the the ZR1 is in terms of performance/price.

The ZR1′s base price is $103,300 (including an $850 destination fee) and has a $10,000 option package available (likely interior upgrades such as the leather-wrapped dash available in other Corvette models), $2,000 chrome wheels, and a mandatory $1,700 gas guzzler tax. It’s interesting to note that the 2009 ZR1 is the first Corvette to be saddled with a gas guzzler tax (estimated EPA ratings are 14 city/20 highway). Forgetting for a moment about the likely dealer “market adjustment” and mandatory gas guzzler tax, the ZR1 is 115% ($55,405) more expensive than a base $47,895 coupe and 41% more expensive ($30,045) than the $73,255 Z06.

So, what do you get for your $103,300 (plus the aforementioned dealer “market adjustment,” which is likely to be particularly problematic for the first cars to hit showrooms)? The quarter mile flashes by in 11.3 seconds at 131 miles per hour; 0 to 60 happens in just 3.4 seconds, and the car can go 0 to 100 in just 7.0 seconds. Manufacturers’ performance claims are often conservative, and in fact, the former bad boy Corvette, the Z06, had a manufacturer-claimed 0 to 60 time of 3.7 seconds, but several magazine tests were able to beat that, with times as low as the ZR1′s claimed 3.4 seconds. GM claims that the Z06′s 0 to 100 time is 7.9 seconds, so the ZR1 is significantly quicker in that metric as well.

Given the large price differentials ($25,360 between a base coupe and a base Z06; $30,045 between the base Z06 and base ZR1), it’s unlikely that many buyers will be comparison shopping among the various Corvette models; some buyers will want the relatively inexpensive and fast base model; others will prefer the more expensive and faster (and more hard-edged) Z06; many will covet and some will step up to the ZR1′s ultimate performance and luxury, which is probably a less hardcore track machine than the Z06, yet thanks to its significant horsepower and braking advantage, can probably still beat the Z06 on most racetracks.

Since the various Corvette models won’t be competing with each other, GM surely enjoyed pointing out in the press release (linked below) how well the ZR1 compared with its competitors in terms of fuel economy. Most of the competitors GM named consume far more fuel than the ZR1 does; the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano is rated at 11 city/15 highway), the Lamborghini Murcielago is rated at 8 city/13 highway, and the Aston Martin V8 Vantage is rated at 12 city/19 highway. Interestingly, two competitors do top the ZR1 in fuel economy; the Dodge Viper bests the ZR1 in highway economy (13 city/22 highway) and the Porsche 911 GT3 bests it in city economy (15 city/22 highway).

Of the competitors named above, the ZR1 is less expensive than all but the Dodge Viper (which is likely on its way to the racetrack in the sky after this current generation runs its course and sells in extremely small numbers). Those prices are: Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano ($270,484), Lamborghini Murcielago ($323,300), Aston Martin V8 Vantage ($114,350), Dodge Viper ($87,460) and Porsche 911 GT3 ($108,360). The Italian exotics and the Viper are pretty close to the ZR1 in terms of power output, but the Aston Martin and Porsche are far below the ZR1 horsepower-wise (415 for the Porsche and 380 for the Aston Martin). The competitors (excepting the Viper) all have higher-quality interiors, but for twice or triple the price, they should as well. Start checking option boxes (there are no less than 19 of them) on a Porsche order form for leather-covered interior bits, and the price quickly gets further from ZR1 territory and closer to Ferrari territory.

While any car costing $103,300 could be called “inexpensive” or a “bargain,” GM has really put an impressive machine into enthusiasts’ hands for the 2009 model year. What GM has also inadvertently shown is what a great performance bargain the upcoming 2009 Cadillac CTS-V, which shares many basic engine components with the ZR1, although in a detuned state, will be if its price is near the rumored $58,000 to $62,000 range.

GM’s press release can be found here.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 2 }

VW Sees Market Shift to Electric Vehicles as Inevitable

But where does that leave them in the U.S. market from a cost perspective?

By Brendan Moore

06.18.2008

Volkswagen chairman Martin Winterkorn recently told the Bild newspaper in Germany that while gasoline-powered cars would still be around, “the future belongs to the electric car.”

I agree with that statement, but what about the problem of what kind of car to sell right now, before the EV (electric vehicle) shows up en masse? VW has that same problem, and their solution is to launch car after car that gets increasingly-better fuel economy and emits increasingly-less pollution until the EV appears in force. VW is shooting for cars in their European market in the next few years that get around 55 mpg average, and given the current market environment of rising gasoline prices in the U.S., their timing may be exquisite in terms of selling those vehicles in the United States as well.

That takes care of the present, and the VW master plan calls for motive power for their future EV models to come from their lithium-ion battery joint effort with Sanyo. VW, like a lot of auto manufacturers, now plans to have a plug-in EV and/or PHEV (plug-in hybrid electric vehicle) for sale in the near future.

It has not escaped Volkswagen’s notice that some of the companies they compete with hammer-and-tongs on the world stage are rolling out EVs and PHEVs in the next couple of years. Toyota announced last week that they would have a PHEV for sale in most of the world by 2010.

Toyota’s announcement comes as competitors like General Motors, Honda Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. are pushing hard on their own hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles. General Motors maintains that they will selling an electric vehicle (EV) with an emergency supplemental gasoline engine – the Chevrolet Volt – by 2010, and already has several dual-mode hybrids and mild hybrid vehicles for sale. Honda announced last month that it will be selling two new hybrids next year and four hybrid vehicles by 2015, including a hybrid version of their Fit/Jazz, currently a very strong seller in regular form. Almost at the same time as Honda’s announcement, Nissan said it will start mass-producing lithium ion batteries next year, and promised an (EV) production vehicle for sale in 2010. Renault says it will be selling an EV in the next two years, and PSA quickly followed suit. The competition is getting very fierce in the green car (hybrid, PHEV, EV, etc.) segment and one has to wonder if VW has been caught out a bit in terms of their lateness to the party.

Toyota’s hybrid Prius, for example, which has been on sale for more than a decade, recently reached cumulative sales of 1 million vehicles. Toyota, Japan’s top automaker, and at this point in the year, the world’s top automaker as well, leads the industry in gas-electric hybrids. The company has stated repeatedly as of late that it will increase hybrid sales to 1 million a year sometime shortly after 2010.

And then, of course, there is the question of where these vehicles will be made. VW is getting crushed by the weak dollar, and in fact, is rumored to be considering ceasing sales of their volume-model Golf (nee Rabbit) in the U.S. because they just can’t make any money on the thing. The current generation of the Golf has proven to be a financial sinkhole for VW right from launch when VW had to resort to expensive incentives just to sell it in the hatchback-averse American market. The Golf/Rabbit has only recently started to be (barely) profitable, and that has only occurred as a result of the massive increases in the cost of gasoline in the U.S.


Volkswagen is planning to open a factory in the U.S. by 2011 to offset the weak dollar factor, but there remains the problem of what to do in the interim. With competitors like GM and Toyota intending to build their EVs, PHEVs and hybrids in the U.S., you can easily see how the same ugly problem would rear its head in regards to the green car segment.

VW aims to triple its US sales to 1m by 2018, and also aims to pass both GM and Toyota in global sales by 2020, including sales of its Audi luxury brand. It’s hard to see how that would work, even putting aside the new market emphasis on green vehicles, and its even harder to envision that result when you factor in the ongoing shift to EV and PHEV vehicles, and realize that VW has nothing in the queue right now that would meet those segment requirements.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 4 }

VW May Discontinue Rabbit/Golf Sales In US

By Kevin Miller

06.18.2008

A recent article in the Financial Times indicates that Volkswagen may halt US sales of the Rabbit hatch because it is unprofitable to sell the European-built vehicle here. Sales may be discontinued in Australia and Brazil for the same reason. It is rumored that the GTI will continue to be imported to maintain its image and heritage.

As we reported earlier this month, VW expects to cut about $1600 out of each next-generation Golf with more efficient production strategies. However, even that amount of savings may not be enough to make the Golf profitable in the US, as the falling dollar continues to make it difficult to profitably sell European vehicles here.

Volkswagen is looking to open a production facility in the US, and the belief is that plant will build the Passat (or similar) mid-sized sedan, as well as possibly the Golf and maybe a smaller, Polo-sized vehicle. US production will help Volkswagen overcome a weak dollar. Until that plant comes online, however, the Golf would be absent from the US market.

This is not good news for Volkswagen sales in the US, as small, fuel efficient vehicles are in high demand because of record gasoline prices. Though the Rabbit is not at the top of its class for fuel economy, it is among Volkswagen’s least expensive and more efficient vehicles in the US. With a goal of tripling sales in the US to 1 million vehicles by 2018, discontinuing the Golf/Rabbit nameplate even temporarily seems to be a contradictory move. Per-vehicle losses are evidently high enough to cause VW to take this step to shore up their financial position in the US.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net- All Rights Reserved

Comments { 2 }

Renault-Nissan-Bajaj Cheap Car Goes Up in Price

And gets a different brand name as well…

By Brendan Moore

06.17.2008

While the $2500 (USD) Nano from Indian auto manufacturer Tata has gotten all the press, Renault-Nissan and motorcycle manufacturer Bajaj of India have been quietly working away on their own cheap and cheerful car for the masses in India. The intent was to match the pricing of the Nano whilst offering just a bit more standard equipment in order to have a competitive advantage in the market, but that strategy has been scrapped for the time-being as the triumvirate is saying privately that the car will be at least $3000 USD. Sources say the $500 increase is due to the ever-rising costs of steel and oil.

So whither the Nano? They are obviously facing the same raw materials cost pressures, and Tata acknowledged as much recently, but the company said that the launch of the car was so important to Tata that a decision had already been made to absorb the additional costs, thereby keeping the price of the Nano at the $2500 mark. Nissan says that they will watch consumer reaction to the Nano carefully when the car is launched this fall. Nissan is planning to launch their car, so far codenamed “ULC”, in 2011.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but 2011 is quite a ways off. Steel and oil could go up even more in the next three years. The $2500 car could become the $4000 car by 2011. In response to those types of comments, the manufacturing trio is circumspect. “It would be difficult to maintain the cost that we announced in 2008. The final price of the car would be decided only after it is manufactured and rolled out,” said a Nissan spokesperson.

As Ian Grasso pointed out in a previous article about the cheap car market in India, it is also worth noting that Tata is the only one with an actual cheap car out this year in India and will be in the proverbial driver’s seat by the time Renault-Nissan-Bajaj gets a car out the door in 2011. They can sell volume units right now and gradually improve the Nano product line while they work out the kinks. Bajaj and Renault-Nissan will come to market with a brand new car years from now that will have to offer more quality (and perhaps luxury) than the Nano did on its introduction – further cutting into either profitability and/or sales. Of course, you can always play devil’s advocate and say that the trio of Renault-Nissan and Bajaj may actually have the advantage in this situation as they can “go to school” on Tata’s pioneer efforts in this segment, learn from that tutorial offered by Tata, and enter the market without making the same mistakes that Tata did.

It was announced earlier in the year through a press release that the production facility for the Renault-Nissan-Bajaj “affordable” car would be set up in Chakan in Maharashtra with a capacity of 400,000 units annually. Bajaj Auto holds 50% in the JV while Nissan and Renault hold 25% each. Small car sales are expected to reach approximately 2 million units per year by 2010, owing to the rapid growth of the Indian middle class.

Bajaj has already indicated that the small car will come in both diesel (CRDi type) as well as petrol versions, fitted with a “unique” two-cylinder engine. One must assume that the two-cylinder engine is probably part of Bajaj’s contribution to the overall effort.


Curiously enough, although the design is finalized, production sites chosen and prepared, and the car itself shown to the press in January, the three companies still have not signed a letter of understanding under which the vehicle will be produced. The companies say there’s no rush and that will be accomplished in due time before the end of 2008.

Lastly, although the car was shown to the press previously with Bajaj badges on it, the recently revised intention is to sell the car as a Nissan or a Renault when it hits the Indian market. Industry consultants say either brand would enjoy a considerable advantage over the Bajaj brand in terms of pitching a new car to the population.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 4 }

Check Your Mirrors

Odds and Ends about Cars and the Car Business

By Brendan Moore

06.17.2008

Sirius and XM are getting closer to the merger initiated last year as an important federal regulator signaled that he was agreeable to the proposed merger. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin confirmed that he would support the deal and stock prices at both companies rose accordingly. Antitrust regulators at the Justice Department have already approved the merger in March of this year, saying that they believe there is no antitrust concern since satellite radio has plenty of competition in the marketplace from iPods, MP3 players, traditional and HD radio, audio on mobile phones, etc. The approval from Martin was contingent on some conditions laid down by the FTC; those conditions would require a pledge to make 24 radio channels available for noncommercial and minority programming, an agreement to cap prices, provide interoperable radios and offer programming on an “a la carte” basis. XM has about 9.3 million subscribers, versus 8.6 million for Sirius.

Auto dealers are in crisis mode concerning inventories of small fuel-efficient cars. Almost every dealer is sold out of new cars that fit that description, and the pressure to keep the used car lot stocked with late-model cars that possess good fuel economy is intense. This has led to bidding wars at the wholesale auctions, and fat trade-in values for consumers when they’re trading in a small car. Conversely, the big iron like SUVs and pickups goes unwanted and unloved on the new car lots as consumers continue to react to $4.00 a gallon gasoline. The wholesale auctions present an even more damning arena for the formerly high-flying SUV and pickup segment, with used car managers from every dealership making the sign of the cross and hurrying away when an SUV or pickup truck comes across the block.

GM says (June 16th) they’re feeling pretty confident about the Chevrolet Volt meeting all of its performance goals and its promised 2010 launch. Bob Lutz says they are also close to naming the battery supplier for the EV that will carry the green flag for GM in the near future. “I would say there’s almost no reasonable doubt in our minds anymore that this is going to work,” said Lutz, who heads vehicle development for GM. Lutz stated that the Volt prototypes are routinely exceeding the desired battery performance parameters, and under some adverse conditions in terms of speed, load, etc.

Skoda says that despite all the rumors of their new SUV being introduced at the London Auto Show next month, the Skoda Yeti will be introduced next year. According to an article in Automotive News, “the SUV will be built at Skoda’s Kvasiny site alongside the large Superb and the Roomster medium minivan. The two Kvasiny assembly lines have a total production capacity of 200,000 units. Skoda will target central Europe with its Yeti and is expected to sell around 50,000 units annually. “It will be positioned to fill the gap of both SUV and MPV (minivan) that are not part of the Skoda product line-up,” said Walt Madeira, manager of European vehicle sales forecasts at the UK office of CSM Worldwide. “Skoda must try to get a piece of the pie as SUV sales are very lucrative.” Eckhard Scholz, Skoda board member in charge of technical development, said in March the car will come in four-wheel drive and front-wheel drive-only variants: “I expect most customers will have the four-wheel drive variant.” I would say that is a pretty safe bet, Eckhard. For those of you that are unfamiliar with Skoda’s recent successes in the marketplace, suffice it to say that they have not put a foot down wrong the last few years, and are transforming themselves into quite a European powerhouse. Skoda is an important part of parent company VW’s plan for world domination by 2020.

Toyota is actively considering converting some truck plants in the U.S. to car production, which should not be a surprise to anyone after the last month of news coverage concerning changing consumer tastes regarding small cars. Mighty Toyota is not immune to those market forces; sales of the full-size Toyota Tundra fell 31.5% in last month compared to sales in May 2007. “Because of the declining sales of the Tundra and SUVs and the resulting decrease in the rate of operation of the lines producing those vehicles in the United States, we may consider a change in structure to enhance the rate of operation,” stated Toyota Executive Vice President Takeshi Uchiyamada. May also saw two Toyota cars, the Corolla and the Camry (along with two Hondas), post some gaudy sales numbers and dislodge the Ford F-150 pickup truck from its usual perch as best-selling vehicle every month, a spot the Ford pickup has held every month since 1991.

Chrysler LLC is probably going to get their upcoming Hornet from Nissan. Nissan will use the Nissan Versa platform to build the sub-compact in Oppama, Japan. The Hornet will be built in 2009 and retail as a 2010 model. Chrysler hopes the Hornet will compete with cars like the Versa, Honda Fit, MINI, VW Rabbit, etc. Chrysler is desperate for some presence in the segment, since the company is extremely weighted towards large trucks and SUVs, and many of their best selling cars are also fairly thirsty. The Hornet concept was originally shown in 2006, caused a stir, and has been waiting for someone to wave a magic wand over it since. It appears that events have now pushed production of the car onto the fast track.

SAIC Motor plans to start production again at its British plant in August making MG-brand sports cars, its president, Chen Hong, said recently. The plant is located in Longbridge and has been idle since last year, when the limited production was pinched off to nothing. Nanjing, the original buyer of MG, was itself acquired by SAIC, another Chinese car company, and as little as three months ago, SAIC was dropping broad hints that they would abandon the Longbridge production site. When Nanjing originally announced the reopening of the famous Longbridge plant, hopes were high that the Chinese company would employ a considerable amount of the former workers, but those hopes were quickly dashed after Nanjing stated that only the MG TF would be produced there. Now SAIC is circling around to the original Nanjing plan. Strangely enough, Nanjing had also planned to produce the MG TF in the small town of Ardmore, Oklahoma in the United States. That early announcement, made quickly after their purchase of MG Rover, was met with head-scratching on both sides of the Atlantic. And after that early announcement, nothing much was ever heard about Ardmore, Oklahoma again, even though Nanjing said they had to make MGs in the United States since they were going to sell so many of them in the United States after the triumphant return of the MG octagon to these shores. SAIC will retail the British-made MG TF sports cars in the UK through approximately 40 dealers, starting at the end of August or in early September, Hong said at a shareholders’ meeting. We shall just have to wait and see if they are able to make that timeline. I have my doubts.



COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 7 }

The Ancient Fiat Putting Ethiopia on the Motoring Map

By Andy Bannister

06.17.2008

Unlikely though it may sound, Ethiopia is the latest country to develop its own car industry. And once again it is a long-obsolete Fiat design which has been pulled out of retirement to kick-start the process.

The much-troubled East African nation has been faring better of late, so much so that it is now one of that continent’s largest importers of motor vehicles. Despite an obvious lack of an industrial base it makes sense for the local economy to develop manufacturing to protect the balance of trade and provide an opportunity to export to neighbouring countries.

Help in this has come from an unlikely source – the government of The Netherlands, which has backed the joint venture and made possible the production of the rather clumsily-named Holland Car Docc (Docc stands for Dutch Overseas Car Company).

The Docc is based on a much-modified version of the 1975 Fiat 131 (sometimes called the Mirafiori). This continues Fiat’s tradition of providing evergreen (or clapped out) designs to countries round the world. Russia still builds a version of the even older Fiat 124 (in the shape of the Lada 2107), and Serbia and Egypt produce versions of the Fiat 128.

The production line for Ethiopia’s pride and joy actually came from Turkey, where a company called Tofas built the 131 for many years as the closely-related Dogan, Sahin and Kartal, modifying the models gradually to make them look a little more modern, whilst retaining very basic mechanicals. As Turkey’s buyers got more sophisticated, however, this elderly design – most popular as a taxi – simply faded away.

Scroll back 30 or so years and the original Fiat 131 was a very square looking design offered as two-door and four-door saloons and an estate car. Even in its heyday it never set the European market alight. And like most Italian cars of that era it was notorious for awful reliability and a propensity to rust within months of leaving the factory.

Despite its many drawbacks the 131 was even sold in the USA for a few years in the late 1970s (latterly known as the Brava), although by that time Fiat’s once significant presence in the American market was winding down to eventual oblivion.

By the end of 1979, when a souped-up version called the 131 Racing 2000TC was offered in Europe with vivid orange paint, the 131 was for a half-second the ultra-fashionable model every executive boy racer wanted, and an undoubtedly fast car. It faded faster than a comet, however, and is now largely forgotten, even though it was also the basis of a highly successful rally car version.

Over 1.5 million 131s were built in Italy until around 1984. Seat of Spain even had its own derivative in the days before its link with Volkswagen.

The main selling point of the Ethiopian Docc, which started production in 2006, seems to be its good ground clearance, according to the company’s website, although it’s hard to believe it is a very practical proposition in most areas bearing in mind the rugged terrain and sheer size of its new homeland.

The car is offered in four door saloon model only, with a fuel injected 1600cc powerplant. Simple maintenance and an easy supply of spare parts are other key features mentioned about the car on the Holland Car website.
The former Fiat’s reign in Africa may be short-lived, however, as the company is already producing a more modern-looking model, the 1300cc Abay (the name means Blue Nile).

The Abay is nothing more than a Chinese Lifan kit assembled in Ethiopia, and its existence is further proof of the extent to which the Chinese industry is gradually infiltrating developing markets.

Holland Car also plans in the future to make 4X4s and pick-ups.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 3 }

GM Now Says Sale of Hummer Brand a Strong Possibility

By Brendan Moore

06.16.2008

General Motors has revised its previous statements regarding Hummer’s future, with the head of GM’s premium sales channel telling dealers last week that an outright sale of the Hummer division to another company is a strong option.

On June 3, GM announced that all options were on the table concerning Hummer; and those options included a revamping of the brand, making the brand a low-volume luxury brand, shutting it down completely, or, selling it. GM’s statement on June 3 presented all of these options as equal in terms of their odds of occurring.

From what Mark McNabb, 47, GM’s new vice president of the premium channel (Cadillac-Hummer-Saab), has told dealers as of last week, apparently several potential buyers have stepped forward since GM’s announcement on the 3rd, and GM now considers a quick sale to be a very strong “Plan A” for Hummer.

The most prevalent rumor surrounding potential buyers for Hummer is that Tata, the Indian auto company and the new owner of Land Rover, is in the lead in terms of potential suitors. McNabb, however, told dealers last week that GM has had no discussions with Tata about Hummer.

McNabb did say, however, that “several global companies” have expressed considerable interest in purchasing Hummer. Besides Tata, one has to conjecture that at least one or two Chinese automakers are probably interested, perhaps (but probably not) one of the Russian firms, and maybe one or two European car companies. Just as with the recent sale of Jaguar and Land Rover, one has to assume that there are also investment groups interested in purchasing Hummer, and through that purchase, entering the car business.


Something interesting to think about is the fact that if an Indian or Chinese company or an investment group buys Hummer, they have an immediate problem: none of those concerns have ever built anything even close to a Hummer. Therefore, they would have to rely on GM for parts, production technology and engineering for years to come. This might be considered a plus in certain ways by certain potential buyers, and conversely, might be considered a liability in other ways. But for those buyers, it would be an inescapable part of the deal, and would also merit some thought by General Motors in that instance as well.

For now, Hummer production lines keep moving. The new H3 pickup starts production very soon in Shreveport, Louisiana, and will go on sale this fall.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Comments { 5 }