CAFE Fight Is Just Beginning, Say Dealers

Dealers support EPA decision to deny Calif. waiver on vehicle emissions


We are reprinting this official press release from the NADA (National Auto Dealers Association) regarding CAFE here as information for our readers, without commentary, as we feel the release speaks for itself.The four-day event ended late yesterday.


SAN FRANCISCO (Feb. 11, 2008) – The fight over fuel economy and vehicle tailpipe emissions is just beginning and America’s franchised new-car and truck dealers are at the center of it, the National Automobile Dealers Association said.

“This is no time for us to relax,” said incoming Chairman Annette Sykora at the 2008 NADA Convention & Exposition in San Francisco today. “In fact, it is because dealers were actively engaged in the CAFE debate that the industry can live to fight another day.”

Sykora, president of Smith Ford Mercury in Slaton, Texas, and Smith South Plains Ford, Lincoln-Mercury, Dodge, Chrysler and Jeep in Levelland, Texas, becomes the first woman chairman at NADA.

NADA supports the aggressive but responsible CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) increase of vehicles to achieve 35 mpg by 2020, which is a 40 percent increase in fuel economy over today’s standards. NADA opposes any effort to overturn the EPA’s decision because it would undermine a federal approach.

“We support a national approach to fuel economy, not a confusing and costly state-by-state patchwork of regulations that could threaten vehicle availability, affordability, safety, and the ability of dealers to engage in interstate vehicle sales and trades,” Sykora said.

In early February, EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson testified before a Senate committee led by California Sen. Barbara Boxer. The EPA defended its decision in December 2007 to deny California a waiver to regulate its own vehicle tailpipe emissions from cars and trucks.

And last week, California Rep. Henry Waxman issued a subpoena to force the EPA to provide documents that supported the agency’s refusal to grant California a waiver.

California has introduced a plan to reduce tailpipe emissions and regulate greenhouse gases from cars and light trucks 30 percent by 2016, starting with the 2009 model year.

Sykora says the “consumer will ultimately decide if a federal fuel-economy standard is successful, because you can’t wave a government wand and make consumers buy a particular type of vehicle.”

Sykora pointed out that Ford’s F-150 pickup has been the No. 1-selling vehicle in the United States for the past 31 years.

“We have a vast country with vastly different transportation needs,” Sykora said. “We don’t want policies that stifle consumer demand. We want to accelerate it.”

Additionally, Sykora warned against the “jalopy effect,” when car owners keep their older, less fuel-efficient vehicles longer. Unless public policy encourages turnover of the existing fleet, the goals of saving energy and cutting tailpipe emissions will not be achieved, she said.

NADA supports the EPA’s decision to deny a waiver because there are no “compelling and extraordinary conditions” unique to California that would justify state regulation of motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions.

This is the first ever waiver request that involves greenhouse gases. All previous waivers addressed atmospheric pollutants that created local and regional air quality concerns. But greenhouse gases are a global concern, NADA stated.

More than 25,000 attendees – auto dealers, automakers and exhibitors – are expected to attend the auto dealers’ 91st annual event. The four-day event runs through Tuesday, February 12.The National Automobile Dealers Association, founded in 1917 and based in McLean, Va., represents about 20,000 new car and truck dealers, with nearly 43,000 separate franchises, domestic and import.


Author: Brendan Moore

Brendan Moore is a Principal Consultant with Cedar Point Consulting , a management consulting practice based in the Washington, DC area. He also manages Autosavant Consulting, a separate practice within Cedar Point Consulting. where he advises businesses connected to the auto industry. Cedar Point Consulting can be found at

Share This Post On

1 Comment

  1. CAFE sucks. It’s a lousy way to accomplish the stated goals of using less gas and cutting pollution, and by the way, I am very much in favor of those goals, and CAFE still sucks.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.