News

Bob Lutz Says Americans Will Not Move to Small Cars Until Gasoline Is More Expensive

11 Comments 28 January 2008

By Brendan Moore

01.28.2008

Last week, Bob Lutz, vice-chairman of General Motors, gave a speech to the Automotive News World Congress in Detroit in which he said that Americans were not going to start liking small cars until the price of gasoline went up. Way up, that is, like to close to European levels, which average around $8 a gallon for regular unleaded as I type this. Lutz’s point was that most American consumers have to want to buy a smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicle because it makes economic sense for them to do so, as opposed to expecting most American consumers to someday want to buy a small, fuel-efficient vehicle out of political or environmental concern.

Quoting from Automotive News (paid subscription required), the host of the World Congress event, Lutz said the following (Automotive News text in italics):

” If for the last 15 years we’d had a slow but sure rise in federal fuel taxation of, say, 15 cents a gallon per year — that would have gradually put the customer in the equation,” he said.

Over time and without any federal fuel economy regulation, the markets could have naturally and gradually transitioned Americans into smaller and more diesel-oriented vehicles, Lutz said.

” I’m not advocating tax hikes or calling for higher fuel prices, I’m just explaining the difference between the European fleet and our own,” he said. ” In America, instead of raising fuel prices, we’ll end up having to raise new vehicle prices, because of the increased use of lightweight materials and fuel-saving technology.”

That will cause more people to hang on to the vehicles they have longer, slowing down new sales growth, ” which is exactly counter to the intended effect,” Lutz said.

” Europeans, at their fuel prices, are willing to pay premium prices for premium small cars that deliver terrific fuel economy. That is not the case here in America, land of the big truck and big horse” and, he added, ” the big American.”

The new federal regulations will also fail to lower the U.S. dependency on petroleum and imported oil, Lutz said. The best near-term solution to doing that is to adopt more E-85, ethanol-burning vehicles.

” It’s just common sense,” Lutz said. ” You don’t roll over the whole fleet at once. It takes decades — and the bigger the price disparity between the old ones and the new ones, the longer it takes.”

Well, he’s right, of course, except for the part about E-85, which I think is at least a time-wasting cul-de-sac, if not a dead-end solution. But he’s right about everything else, but it really doesn’t matter if he’s right or not, because politicians make the laws, including the CAFE regulations and one thing that politicians are NOT going to do is raise the federal gasoline tax. It’s a lot easier to push off responsibility for encouraging Americans to use less gasoline on to the vehicle manufacturers.

But they know, and just about anyone else that that gives the matter any kind of thought knows, that Americans will stop using less gasoline when gasoline is expensive for a few years in a row. As an example, I guarantee that 36 consecutive months of $5 a gallon gasoline would have Americans embracing smaller cars in a hurry.

But instead we have the bad theatre that is CAFE. It is a joke, but the joke is on us, the American public, because CAFE is not going to be anything close to a solution to our oil addiction vis-à-vis the vehicles we drive.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Editorials

Why Chrysler’s New Consumer Advisory Board Won’t Work

4 Comments 25 January 2008

By Chris Haak

01.25.2008

Deborah Meyer, Chrysler’s head of marketing (whom the automaker recruited from Lexus last year) announced yesterday several product-related initiatives.

First, more Chrysler vehicles will offer extra features without extra cost to improve Chrysler’s value message. Changes include things such as adding Stow ‘n Go seats to the entry-level Dodge Caravan, 17 inch wheels on the Charger, and more. The goal with these changes is to simplify both the ordering and the manufacturing process for Chrysler vehicles. These changes are a good idea, as long as they are accompanied by the previously-reported interior improvements to vehicles like the Sebring and Avenger. Since many of Chrysler’s current lineup is not class-leading, it’s important that they at least can share a message of features, content, and value with potential consumers.

Their second initiative – establishing online Consumer Advisory Boards of up to 2,000 consumers total – may sound like a good idea at first glance, but I really don’t think it will work. The theory behind them is to give Chrysler immediate feedback on products and marketing. Since the Dodge brand is currently heavily tilted toward the male side of the spectrum, one of the first panels convened will be a group of young female Dodge customers in an attempt to broaden that brand’s demographic.

Here’s why I don’t believe this idea will work: when Chrysler has been at its best, it has had polarizing products. The 1994 Ram pickup – one of Chrysler’s biggest hits of the past 15 years – eschewed the conservative style of its virtually ignored predecessor and established Dodge’s pickups as the toughest-looking full-size pickups on the market. Many potential buyers hated them, but many loved them, and sales exploded. I don’t know what kind of clinic work was done for the 1994 Ram, but I’m guessing that the objective was to actually have a polarizing style, rather than something benign that most folks found inoffensive (and also unexciting).

Think of another, more recent, Chrysler product hit: the 300 sedan. Again, polarizing styling, not attempting to be all things to all people. Ironically, compare the Chrysler 300 with the Ford Five Hundred, which competes for many of the same customers and was launched at nearly the same time. The Five Hundred was a handsome automobile, but its Novacain-influenced styling didn’t get anyone’s blood flowing. Nobody said the car was ugly, but few people wanted to buy a giant, underpowered version of the Audi A6.

On top of these examples, I recall Ed Welburn, GM’s VP for global design speaking about the well-received Cadillac CTS Coupe Concept. He said that the car was never shown to customers in clinics; consequently, the car was not neutered and was shown to the public exactly as its designers intended. Some people who saw the car felt that the decklid was too short, or some other part needed work, but the overall reaction was positive.

The bottom line is, while soliciting customer feedback is important, many marketing people will tell you that the consumer has no idea what he wants – especially when you ask him.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Features, News

Admiring the Ford Verve Concept from All Angles

5 Comments 25 January 2008

By Mike Mello

01.25.2008
You’ve probably already heard about the Ford Verve concept unveiled at the Detroit Auto Show, and maybe you’ve read about it here or seen a few shots of the car on television. After recently seeing the Verve in Detroit, I wanted to share some of my photos and design opinions on the car since it’s worth a good look.
I think the Verve has a great stride to it. The relationship of the roof line to the placement of the wheels helps the car look elegant and lively.


There’s a lot of surface transitions near the base of the A pillar but I think they work well – especially where the body line below the mirror meets that strong fender arch. The lines don’t intersect and I like the tension that’s created in this area. What do you think of those hot redwall tires? Any possibility of those reaching production? The antique reproduction market has them!


The Verve’s front light assembly looks alive. Lighting here, as in many recent cars, has again become a major area of brand identity. The headlight cluster makes such a big impression on your first look at a car that it simply has to look sharp. This design definitely delivers, including the lower signal lamp.


Following the crisp line up the A-pillar reveals a large glass roof panel. Something about that giant piece of glass seems too good to be true…


The Verve’s rear quarter maintains an energetic feel and the body line below the taillight helps keep the corners looking trim. Wrap-around taillights point towards the front end and help reinforce the comfortably aggressive stance.


What do you think? Does the Verve look like it’s ready for delivery? Although we’re only looking at exterior shots here, you can see a few interior views in the post mentioned up in the first paragraph. Are there any changes you would make to the exterior? Hopefully the Verve concept is very close to what we’ll see in North America by 2010.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Editorials

Is Enclave Cool Enough to Lure Younger Buyers to Buick?

6 Comments 25 January 2008

By Kevin Miller

01.25.2008


Buick has needed a great car- a real product hit- for a long time. Seemingly the choice of AARP members and conservative Midwesterners, the brand’s largely unexciting and un-involving vehicles were not on the shopping lists of many car buyers under the age of 50, or even 60.

Now that the stylish Enclave crossover is in Buick’s lineup, younger customers are finally starting to make their way into Buick showrooms. A friend of mine, a 30-something West Coast mom, is looking for a new vehicle in the Enclave’s category. She has test driven the Enclave and the GMC Acadia, as well as the Acura MDX and the Cadillac SRX. As she currently drives a Honda CR-V which she has been happy with , she intends to try the Honda Pilot as well. Of the vehicles she has driven so far, the Enclave is her favorite. She was quite surprised to find out that her dealership in a suburb of Portland, Oregon, has a 10 week wait on delivery of new Enclaves.

Automotive News reported this week that GM is increasing production of the Enclave, to meet demand for the hot-selling crossover. Buick is also rolling out a change in the way they allocate Enclaves to dealers. Enclaves will be allocated using a “turn-and-earn” system, which allocates more vehicles to the dealers who sell more vehicles.

Jim Bunnell, the head of Buick, Pontiac, and GMC stated that in the next three months, Enclave production will be increased. While sales were anticipated to be around 3000 per month, the crossovers have been selling at a rate of 4000 to 5000 per month. December saw sales of 4726 Enclaves. Bunnell also indicated that there will be few incentives available on the Enclave, because it is selling so well without them.

My friend’s main concern about the Enclave was the fact that she isn’t young enough to drive a Buick. Her grandmother drives a Buick (actually a pretty nice supercharged Regal GS), and she considers Buicks to be old-peoples’ cars. That isn’t an uncommon viewpoint among vehicle shoppers in their 30s and 40s, especially on the West Coast.

GM is going to great lengths to try to change that viewpoint. The stylish design of the Enclave and its nicely appointed interior truly are distinctive, attractive, and world-class. Advertisements for the crossover do a good job highlighting these features.

The fact that my friend considered the Buick Enclave, sat in the Buick, and took it for a test drive is proof that GM and Buick are succeeding in reaching out beyond the brand’s traditional demographic; previously a 30-something West Coast mom wouldn’t have typically ventured in to a Buick showroom. The fact that she drove the Enclave and LOVED it, and truly preferred it to other vehicles, is proof that the tide of consumer opinion is changing, one consumer at a time. Buick (and GM as a whole) are making world-class cars. Some of GM’s new cars are now as good as their Asian and European competitors. And some of GM’s new cars are BETTER than competetitors’ vehicles… namely the Buick Enclave and the Cadillac CTS.

The fact that there is a 10-week wait for Enclaves is telling. There certainly isn’t that size of backlog for an MDX over at the Acura dealership. So to all you hipsters who are on the fence about choosing the Enclave because you think you aren’t old enough to drive a Buick- GO FOR IT. You can change people’s perceptions, and drive the car that makes you happy at the same time.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

News

2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 to Be Shown at Chicago

5 Comments 25 January 2008

By Brendan Moore

01.25.2008

Dodge will show the production model of the Dodge Challenger SRT8 at the Chicago Auto Show on February 6.

The exterior of the Dodge Challenger looks very close to the concept shown in 2006, so close that most people would be hard-pressed to tell the difference.

Dodge dealers started taking orders for the Challenger in early December in anticipation of spring deliveries. The Challenger is priced at $37,995 MSRP, which is a lot more than when the Challenger first showed up as a 1970 model, right in the middle of the red-hot pony car wars. No one knew then just how short-lived that war would be – new government regulations and high gasoline prices put an end to the horsepower wars just a few short years later.

Now its 2008 and new CAFÉ rules from the federal government and high gasoline prices are already here as the new Challenger debuts. The SRT8’s 6.1 liter Hemi V8 puts out a thundering 425 HP and 420 lb-ft of torque, shoves it through a six-speed auto box and may look out of place in just a few years, but for right now, its still cause for a party.

And although there was an embargo on this until Feb. 6 from Chrysler LLC, this story and the photo is all over the web. So here we are…


COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

News

Toyota May Have Actually Beaten GM in 2007 Sales

3 Comments 25 January 2008

By Chris Haak

01.25.2008

Autosavant – and basically every other media outlet – first reported on Wednesday that Toyota and GM had sold almost an identical number of new vehicles in 2007. That number was 9.37 million (for GM, it was specifically 9,369,524, and for Toyota, it was 9.37 million units). Since GM’s figure rounded up to 9.37 million units, both automakers appeared to be tied for the title of “world’s largest automaker.” What wasn’t certain at the time was whether Toyota was also rounding up to 9.37 million as GM did, or if it was rounding down to 9.37 million.

Around 11:15 a.m. Wednesday, Reuters broke with news that an unnamed source inside Toyota pegged their number at a more precise 9.366 million, apparently giving the title to GM. Autosavant later updated the article linked above with this new information; the difference between the two figures, depending again on whether Toyota’s number was more precise, was around 3,000 to 3,500 sales, or about 0.06%.

Twenty four hours later, however, Automotive News broke with the headline, “We call it: Toyota topped GM in 2007.” They went on to explain that GM was counting Wuling-branded vehicles sold in China and manufactured by its joint venture with SAIC, called SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co. The problem with GM including these Wuling vehicles in its global total is that GM only owns 34% of the company, while SAIC (which stands for Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.) owns 50.1%. Automotive News stated that industry practice is to exclude sales figures for only majority-owned subsidiaries, so it deducted the 516,435 units of Wuling sales from GM’s total to arrive at a new figure of 8,885,599 vehicles. This is the same counting treatment that Ford gets for Mazda; Ford owns 33.4% of Mazda, so Mazda sales are not counted in Ford’s global sales total.

Clearly, this makes a large difference in the quest for global bragging rights. Though both companies play down the importance of being #1, both companies also surely would like to hold the title.

I have no problem with the logic employed by Automotive News except that Toyota has not released its detailed 2007 sales number (nor does it expect to for another month or so), and I don’t see how AN can be sure that Toyota is excluding any non-Toyota-branded vehicles made in joint ventures. I am not aware of any such ventures, but there may be some.

As of today, though, it sounds like there’s a new #1 in the race for global automotive supremacy. Will it last for 76 years as GM’s reign did? Will GM take back the title, or will Volkswagen swoop in and take it, as they hope? Time will tell.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Editorials

Lifan 3-Series is a Chinese Mini Cooper Knockoff

3 Comments 24 January 2008

By Chris Haak

01.24.2008

Earlier this week, Chinese automaker Lifan showed its 3-Series sedan to assembled media. While the name would make one think that the vehicle is a clone of the BMW 3-Series, in fact, it’s a clone of a different product in BMW’s portfolio: The Mini Cooper.

Lifan has added its own twist to the Mini Cooper, however, by messing up the proportions in the front end and adding two more doors. It will reach Chinese consumers in the first half of the year; no word on whether they’d dare to try selling it in Europe, where it would meet legal objections similar to those faced by Shuanghuan when it attempted to show its Noble Smart ForTwo knockoff at the Frankfurt auto show a few months ago.

Ironically enough, the Lifan 3-Series has nearly the same engine under its disfigured and ill-proportioned hood that the previous generation Mini Cooper had.

Thanks to CarScoop for the photos and information on this latest example of the Chinese disregard for intellectual property rights.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

News

Wal-Mart May Sell Hybrids for "Major Companies" – Chinese Ones?

5 Comments 24 January 2008

By Chris Haak

01.24.2008

According to Bloomberg this morning, Wal-Mart Chief Executive Lee Scott gave a speech in Kansas City to store managers yesterday in which he has discussed selling gasoline-electric hybrid cars and plug-in automobiles at the company’s stores.

Scott was deliberately vague about which companies he had discussed this with, using the term “major companies.” He was also noncommittal about when or if it would actually happen, saying, “Maybe there isn’t room for Wal-Mart in this right now, but something tells me that there may be some role for us in the future.”

Considering that Wal-Mart is the #1 importer of Chinese goods in the US, and there is political opposition to selling Chinese cars in the US right now, it’s not a huge leap of logic to assume that Mr. Scott is talking with Chinese automakers with aspirations of selling vehicles in the US market. It’s also no surprise that, with the sorry displays put on by the Chinese automakers in Detroit last week and in crash tests posted to YouTube over the past few years, that he might be hesitant to name the companies, or even the country the companies are headquartered in.

Of course, I’m only speculating. In most cases, negotiations with automakers would be confidential until they are complete, so maybe he’s talking with someone like Toyota. But would Toyota – or any automaker currently in the US – really want their marketing messages tied to the low-prices-at-any-cost marketing message that Wal-Mart offers? Also, state franchise laws would probably make it difficult, if not impossible, for manufacturers with an existing dealer presence in those states to sell vehicles at Wal-Mart stores.

I’ve heard whispers before that Wal-Mart would be the beach head by which Chinese automakers enter the US market. Nothing is confirmed at this point, of course, but it would not surprise me in the least to see this manifest itself as a reality over the next few years.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

News

Opel and Saab to Build Future European Chevrolets

5 Comments 24 January 2008

By Andy Bannister

01.24.2008

General Motors has big plans to sell a million Chevrolets annually across the whole of Europe; including Russia, and within two years, mostly by increasing local production using underutilised GM factories.

Opel’s Russelsheim plant in Germany and the Saab factory in Trollhattan, Sweden, are in the frame to build various Chevrolet models, reports say. This would take pressure off GM Daewoo’s Korean factories which are struggling to keep up with worldwide demand for its Chevrolet-badged products.

Chevrolet Epica


The German plant could build the Chevy Epica – a traditional four-door saloon – and Sweden is pencilled in for the replacement (and hopefully much improved) Lacetti. The Lacetti (known as the Suzuki Reno/Forenza in the US) is due to share a platform with the next generation Opel Astra.

Quite how this plan sits with Chevrolet’s position as GM’s value brand is unclear, as high-cost European factories don’t normally equate with low prices.

In 2007, Chevrolet’s almost entirely Korean-supplied range sold 167,700 units in western Europe (up 10% on 2006), and did even better in the remainder of Europe (including Russia) with a total of 284,000 units (up 51%).

Chevrolet Tacuma

This success is based more on metal-for-money rather than outstanding products. As well as the Lacetti and Epica, the ex-Daewoo models wearing the Chevy badge in Europe include the old-before-its-time Tacuma small MPV and the Matiz microcar.

Chevrolet Captiva

The best of this Korean bunch is probably the good value, new Chevrolet Captiva SUV, also sold in slightly different form as the Opel Antara.

American Chevrolets hardly get a look in so far in Europe although small-scale sales of the HHR have just started in some markets, including Germany and Italy. Corvette is a marque in its own right here, sold half-heartedly through Cadillac’s struggling dealers, and so does not share a showroom with the Korean-built line-up.

European-made Chevolets are, however, already starting to come on stream. The old FSO factory in Poland, which used to make deeply undesirable models based on the technology of 1960s Fiats, is now producing the Aveo saloon, which is sold alongside its Korean-built Kalos hatchback brother.

The further east you go the more Chevy seems to be a success in Europe. In Russia it is now the top foreign make (Ford is second) selling 190,000 vehicles in 2007. By contrast, GM’s Opel marque shifted 66,000 units.


In Russia the Chevrolet line-up is even more of a mixed bag than further west, thanks to the GM Avtovaz joint venture with Lada, by far Russia’s most successful indigenous manufacturer.

One product unique to Russia is the Chevrolet Niva, a small SUV which is an evolution of the original Lada Niva 4X4 dating back to 1977. The Niva has a 1.7-litre engine and excellent off-road capabilities.


Other Chevrolets sold on the Russian market include the Viva, which is basically a rebadged version of the previous generation Opel Astra saloon. Budget buyers can also choose the Chevrolet Lanos, a version of the old Daewoo of the same name.

A number of other models including the Aveo, Lacetti and Tacuma are manufactured in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad.

For once, GM seems to have pulled off a real success story, taking a marque which was virtually unknown in Europe and making into a real contender. With future platform sharing set to improve the quality of the line-up, it looks like Chevy is here to stay on this side of the pond.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

News

Volkswagen’s US Production Plans Take Shape

7 Comments 24 January 2008

By Chris Haak

01.24.2008

As discussed earlier, Volkswagen has some ambitious US sales goals and wants to surpass both GM and Toyota as the world’s largest automaker by 2018. However, the dollar’s weakness relative to the Euro (or the Euro’s strength relative to the dollar, as the case may be) makes it extremely cost prohibitive to sell European-built vehicles in the US. The fact that these are not luxury cars with the typical luxury car profit margins makes Volkswagen’s situation even more difficult.

Now, VW doesn’t build all of its cars in Germany – in fact, it builds Volkswagen New Beetle, New Beetle cabrio and Jetta in Mexico for US sales – models that make up 56% of its sales in the US. But some mainstream cars like the Rabbit, GTI/R32, and Passat – plus the Touareg SUV – are built exclusively in Germany for US sales, which makes their value proposition against Asian and domestic competition questionable. Sure, German engineering is nice to have, but is it worth paying 10%+ more for a Volkswagen with questionable quality than a comparable Chevy, Ford, Honda, or Toyota?

Consequently, VW is faced with a handful of choices. They could de-content their German-built vehicles, but that would go counter to their “affordable premium vehicles” marketing message. Another option would be to expand their production in Mexico, but VW of America CEO Stefan Jacoby said that the factory in Puebla, Mexico “has come to its limit” and will not be further expanded.

That leaves the option of building a new assembly plant in the US (assuming VW would not consider building a plant in a low-cost country for US sales). Since there is already a significant German supplier and auto manufacturing base in the US South (and VW has confirmed that it will build a new plant – not where specifically, but that it would be somewhere in the Eastern time zone), and rumors are that VW has scouted sites in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, it seems likely that their new plant will be in one of those states. The new assembly plant will produce up to 250,000 units per year.

Mr. Jacoby announced today that Volkswagen is also planning to build engine and transmission plants in North America to support the new plant. He also added that VW will announce the site selection for its plant within six months. Mr. Jacoby said in Detroit last week that the new plant would likely produce the core products for the US lineup – which means the Passat (currently built in Europe), the Tiguan small crossover (also currently built in Europe), and a new future crossover. Basically, they want to produce as much of their US sales volume as they can in the US or Mexico to avoid the strong Euro/weak dollar problem.

The result of increased US production will lower the price premium charged for products like the Passat from the current 10% over rivals’ prices to 5% instead.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

What we do

We love cars and the car business, no matter where that takes us - United States, Japan, Germany, France, China, Brazil, Australia, India, the U.K, etc. You get the idea. No subscription fees, no sign-up, no sign-in - all you have to do is just show up and start reading. We provide both opinion and information. We have two writers in the EU, one in Asia, and five in the U.S. We focus on the United States (because we're here), but we want our readers to have the benefit of seeing a global picture regarding automotive products and industry. We hope you enjoy the site.

Used Car Bargains – Updated Monthly!

This is stored on our Used Car page - just click here and you will go there post haste. Which models are bargains month after month? Which models are bargains as of the past few months and may not be in the future as the price of gasoline continues to rise? We know, and we have added some more bargain used vehicles to the list this month, so check it out.