2008 Honda Accord Officially Introduced

The new midsize sedan benchmark has been set.

By Chris Haak

08.21.2007

Although the 2008 Accord may well be the most-leaked vehicle in recent automotive history (its interior and exterior were captured by countless spy photographers, in both disguised and undisguised forms), today Honda officially pulled the wraps off of the Accord. And wow, is it an impressive car.

At the risk of sounding like a Honda press release, I’ll begin by stating what I am not enamored with the exterior styling of the sedan – which is the model I’d buy if I was in the market for a new car. It is something of a derivative shape, and cribs some styling cues from BMW, the Acura RL, and even the Hyundai Sonata. To my eyes, it doesn’t look as bad as some of its critics are trying to portray it. I wouldn’t call it ugly, but it’s neither beautiful nor unique. It is, however, more interesting than the ho-hum styling of the current model, of which I’m an owner for the past four years. The coupe, on the other hand, has a similar-looking but entirely unique body and has a much sleeker and sportier appearance.

All Accord models have improved fuel economy, safety features, interior room, and horsepower compared to their predecessors. Engine offerings include two 2.4 liter four cylinders (177 horsepower in the base LX and LX-P sedans, 190 horsepower in the EX and EX-L sedans and LX-S and EX coupe) and a new 3.5 liter V6 (268 horsepower in the EX-L V6 sedan and coupe). Five-speed manual transmissions are standard in all four-cylinder models, and five-speed automatic transmissions are standard in all V6 models and optional in all four-cylinder models. There is also a six-speed manual available exclusively in the EX-L V6 6MT coupe. Fuel economy for the V6 has improved from 18 city/26 highway to 19 city/29 highway (by 1 mpg in the city and 3 mpg on the highway) when comparing the new for 2008 EPA ratings, in spite of the car moving from the EPA midsize to large car class, gaining 150 pounds, and 24 horsepower. That’s a 5.6% improvement in city mileage and an 11.5% improvement in highway mileage, in a bigger, more powerful car. Much of the thanks goes to Honda’s cylinder deactivation, which can run the V6 in three-, four-, or six-cylinder mode depending on need. Most likely, all six cylinders aren’t needed for steady-state highway cruising, so some of them are shut down to conserve fuel. Honda also includes Active Noise Control sound cancellation standard on all V-6 models with automatic transmission and on all 190-hp four-cylinder cars to mitigate any vibrations or noises from the four cylinders or the V6 running on three or four cylinders.

Inside, the back seat has more room (according to Honda, nearly as much legroom as the Pilot SUV) and comfort. The dash and instrument panel were redesigned to move the 8″ navigation screen up and more into the driver’s line of sight. Models without navigation have a multi-display in its place to show HVAC and audio settings. Some have criticized the new Accord’s interior as being too button-heavy, but when an interior includes all of the technology that this one does (navigation, Bluetooth, XM Satellite Radio, CD changer, dual zone climate control), it’s difficult to control everything without a button. At any rate, the buttons are logically arranged and large so that they can be operated with minimum distraction. The alternative would be excluding the technology (as GM has chosen to do with its 2008 Chevrolet Malibu) or using an iDrive-type interface as BMW, Audi, and Mercedes do (and are oft-criticized). The interior has some premium detailing absent from the old model, such as horizontal trim strips across the dash and door panels and jewel-like gauges, and Honda claims that material quality has been upgraded (and they were already pretty good in most places). Frankly, the EX-L interior reminds me very much of an Acura’s, and that’s definitely a good thing in a mainstream sedan.

Safety equipment sets the class standard. The Accord comes with six airbags and stability control, active head restraints, four wheel ABS and four wheel disc brakes, all standard.

Final pricing has not been released yet, but I expect it to be in line with the outgoing 2007 model’s pricing; that is, between $20,000 and $30,000, which isn’t bad considering the amount of safety, technology, and performance that you’re getting for the money.

Comparisons between the Accord and its midsize sedan classmates will be inevitable. Objectively, it has basically everything on paper that the class leaders have – it’s two horsepower shy of the Altima’s 270-horsepower V6, but gets the best V6 fuel economy in its class, in spite of only having a five-speed automatic – and recent Accords have been very good as space efficiency in a smaller package; I expect more of the same from this iteration.

A sidebar to the Accord’s launch is that the 2008 Chevy Malibu is put in the unenviable position of having to launch against this car. The Malibu has an optional six-speed automatic, but is down on horsepower and fuel economy (the similar 2008 Saturn Aura gets 17/26 city/highway according to the EPA, which is about 12% less). Now having seen the Malibu’s competition, and having seen GM fans already clamoring for the next generation replacement of a car that still has yet to be launched itself, the Malibu’s work is more than cut out for it. It would be difficult enough to convince loyal Honda, Toyota, and Nissan buyers to leave their comfort zone and consider a Malibu or Saturn even if those cars were clearly superior to the Accord, but when the Accord is probably already a better car, where’s the compelling reason to jump ship? This means that GM will probably have to resort to selling the Malibu on its “value” rather than its features, which is a shame. Unfortunately, the US auto market, and particularly the midsize sedan market, is extremely competitive. While the Malibu is heads and tails better than the 2004-2007 model, it might not be good enough to change peoples’ minds when the Honda Accord is also hitting dealers’ lots. I hope for GM’s sake that I’m wrong.

COPYRIGHT Autosavant.net – All Rights Reserved

Author: Chris Haak

Chris is Autosavant's Managing Editor. He has a lifelong love of everything automotive, having grown up as the son of a car dealer. A married father of two sons, Chris is also in the process of indoctrinating them into the world of cars and trucks.

Share This Post On

7 Comments

  1. The Accord styling might be a bit too “rental fleet” look to my tastes or being a shadow of itself compared to the 1989-89 gen with the hidden headlights like the Prelude of that era and the 1990-93. Then I’m perplexed and intrigued to see the Accord sales going into a slow downhill from 2002 to 2006 (I don’t count the 2007 year yet).

    Perhaps younger buyers check elsewhere (Hyundai for example), disliking the idea of the Accord succumbed to the temptation of being “longer, larger, wider” while the Accord morphed into grand’pa car like the Camry or another factor could had play, the over-popularity of the previous gens to the point of being a bit “too” common for the Accord.

    Meanwhile, Mazda will show soon its next-gen Mazda 6 at the Frankfurt auto show and this car could create some surprises, perhaps I’m too optimist for Mazda but who knows? Also the return of the Ford Taurus in the incarnation of the Ford 500 with the upcoming Duratec 35/Cyclone, might give to Ford a hidden ace and with the 2008 EPA test of the Taurus 18 EPA mpg city and 28 highway (just 1 mpg city/1 mph highway difference with the Accord)…it’s very hard to resist to the temptation of not eyeing the Taurus as well.

  2. This will be another home run for Honda. I wish it looked better, but it is Japanese, after all. But it (looks) doesn’t matter, really, does it? Great engineering and great quality will carry the day for the faithful that worship so regularly at the Church of Honda.

    Honda makes an awesome car.

  3. The exterior on this new Accord makes me want to retch. I’m very clearly aware of what the Honda brand represents, and this body shape does NOTHING to visually enforce Honda’s design values, whatever’s left of them.

    The interior, however, looks like a win. I want to touch it.

    If we’re talking hypothetical Accord vs. ‘Bu, that’s a tough one. Both represent a lengthy leap past their predecessors, both improve massively on the previous generation’s interiors. The Accord stands a better chance of having its interior screwed straight-and-level, but the Malibu looks a DANG sight better on the outside, from all directions.

    And Mssr. Dumas has an excellent point; the Mazda6 is coming, and the teaser shots I’ve seen look like serious hotness.

  4. You would think that will all the money, all the talent, and all the resources Honda has, that they could hire some designers. Or, if they can’t figure out how to do that, send the design work out. I’m sure it’s a great car, but MAN, it looks frumpy.

  5. I think the coupe looks great. No complaints there and I bet it moves out pretty good with the high-end V6 and the manual. I have a feeling it is probably a bargain in terms of performance.

  6. I was driving Toyotas when my daughter went off and bought an Accord. Two weeks later I was in the driver’s seat of my own Honda Ridgeline. Design is such a personal thing that I won’t even comment on that other than to say that it looks like some Acura drawings got into the hands of the Honda engineers…and that’s a good thing. But what’s really impressive is the balance of power and safety that is embodied in the new Accord. I’ve driven them here in Bradenton Florida in a Florida downpour and in extreme steering situations…it’s no false sense of security when that VSA kicks in…it’s real!

  7. This is a must drive vehicle. From the outside..”beauty is in the eyes of the beholder” so I won’t go there. But driving! That’s where the rubber meets the road, and in this encarnation of the Accord..in the worst of conditions,and I’ve done it, when that VSA engages..the sense of security is real! It held my intended course where otherwise I’d have been fishtailing or worse understeering into oncoming traffic. Very impressed.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.